4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Optical properties of LFZ grown β-Ga2O3:Eu3+ fibres

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 258, 期 23, 页码 9157-9161

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.07.069

关键词

LFZ; Ga2O3; Eu; PL; PLE

资金

  1. FCT [PTDC/CTM/66195/2006, PTDC/CTM/100756/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to their relevance for electronic and optoelectronic applications, transparent conductive oxides (TCO) have been extensively studied in the last decades. Among them, monoclinic beta-Ga2O3 is well known by its large direct bandgap of similar to 4.9 eV being considered a deep UV TCO suitable for operation in short wavelength optoelectronic devices. The wide bandgap of beta-Ga2O3 is also appropriate for the incorporation of several electronic energy levels such as those associated with the intra-4f(n) configuration of rare earth ions. Among these, Eu3+ ions (4f(6)) are widely used as a red emitting probes both in organic and inorganic compounds. In this work, undoped and Eu2O3 doped (0.1 and 3.0 mol%) Ga2O3 crystalline fibres were grown by the laser floating zone approach. All fibres were found to stabilize in the monoclinic beta-Ga2O3 structure while for the heavily doped fibres the X-ray diffraction patterns show, in addition a cubic europium gallium garnet phase, Eu3Ga5O12. The spectroscopic properties of the undoped and Eu doped fibres were analysed by Raman spectroscopy, low temperature photoluminescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE). The Eu3+ luminescence is mainly originated in the garnet, from where different europium site locations can be inferred. The spectral analysis indicates that at least one of the centres corresponds to Eu3+ ions in dodecahedral site symmetry. For the lightly doped samples, the spectral shape and intensity ratio of the D-5(0)-> F-7(J) transitions is totally different from those on Eu3Ga5O12, suggesting that the emitting ions are placed in low symmetry sites in the beta-Ga2O3 host. (C) 2011 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据