4.5 Article

Downregulation of hepatic acyl-CoA:diglycerol acyltransferase in chronic renal failure

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00358.2003

关键词

chronic kidney disease; triglycerides; atherogenesis; dyslipidemia; liver

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic renal failure (CRF) is associated with hyper-triglyceridemia and elevated plasma VLDL and IDL concentrations. These events can be due to either increased production or depressed catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Several studies have documented downregulation of lipoprotein lipase, hepatic triglyceride lipase, and the VLDL receptor, leading to depressed clearance and elevated plasma concentration of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants in CRF. However, the effect of CRF on the triglyceride biosynthetic pathway has not been explored. Diglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) is a microsomal enzyme that joins acyl-CoA to 1,2 diacylglycerol and, as such, constitutes the final step in triglyceride biosynthesis. Two distinct forms of DGAT (DGAT-1 and -2) have thus far been identified. The present study was undertaken to examine the effect of CRF on DGAT gene expression and activity in the liver, which is the source of endogenous triglycerides in the circulation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were studied 8 wk after 5/6 nephrectomy ( CRF) or sham operation. DGAT-1 and DGAT-2 mRNA abundance and DGAT activity were quantified. The CRF group showed reduced creatinine clearance, elevated plasma triglycerides, and VLDL concentrations. This was accompanied by significant reductions in hepatic DGAT-2 mRNA abundance (P < 0.01) and total DGAT activity (P < 0.1), pointing to diminished hepatic triglyceride production capacity in CRF animals. In conclusion, CRF results in significant downregulation of hepatic DGAT gene expression and activity. Given the critical role of DGAT in triglyceride biosynthesis, the present study points to diminished, not increased, hepatic triglyceride synthetic capacity in CRF rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据