4.7 Article

Preparation high photocatalytic activity of CdS/halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) nanocomposites with hydrothermal method

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 698-704

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.102

关键词

CdS; Halloysite nanotube; Hydrothermal method; Photocatalysis; Tetracycline

资金

  1. Research Foundation of Jiangsu University, China [11JDG107]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [SBK2011460]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20113227110019]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2011M500861, 2012M511219, 2011M500869]
  5. program for Postgraduate Research Innovation in University of Jiangsu University [CXLX12_0634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel nanocatalyst CdS/halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) was synthesized by hydrothermal method with direct growth of CdS nanoparticles on the surface of HNTs. The as-prepared photocatalysts had been characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis DRS), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and the thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA). The photocatalytic activity of the sample was evaluated by the degradation of tetracycline (TC) under visible light irradiation. Benefit from the excellent properties of CdS and HNTs, the photocatalyst exhibited good photocatalytic activity and stability. In order to find out the optimum synthesis condition to obtain the best photocatalytic activity, a series of experiments were performed with different CdS loading capacity, different sources of sulfide and different hydrothermal temperatures, etc. The best photodegradation rate could reach 93% in 60 min under visible light irradiation. Therefore, the combination of CdS nanoparticles with HNTs endowed this material with a potential use in environmental treatments in industries. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据