4.8 Review

Significant influence of TiO2 photoelectrode morphology on the energy conversion efficiency of N719 dye-sensitized solar cell

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 248, 期 13-14, 页码 1381-1389

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.006

关键词

dye-sensitized solar cells; TiO2 photoelectrode; morphology; light scattering; N719 ruthenium complex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since Gratzel's group reported an overall efficiency of 10% for dye-sensitized solar cell using cis-di(thiocyanato)bis(2,2'-bipyridyl-4,4'-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II), many other institutions have tried to reproduce it. However, no other institutions have, so far, reported such a high efficiency. In order to develop high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells, the tuning of TiO2 photoelectrode morphology towards optimization of solar energy conversion efficiency has been investigated. TiO2 photoelectrodes with six different structures, with layers of nanoparticles, light-scattering particles, and mixture of nanoparticles and light-scattering particles on the conducting glass at a desirable sequence and thickness. were designed and investigated. The profiles of photocurrent action spectra were compared in terms of light scattering and the suppression of light loss due to the back-scattering of large particles near the conducting glass. The data show that the multilayer structure is superior to the mono- and double-layer structure, with similar to85% of incident monochromatic photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) below 620 nm and similar to45% of IPCE at 700 nm. The solar-to-electric energy conversion efficiency of N719 dye-sensitized solar cell has been improved significantly from 7.6 to 9.8% by tuning the film structure from monolayer to multilayer. The best efficiency of 10.2% under illumination of simulated AM1.5 solar light (100 MW cm(-2)) was attained with a multilayer structure using an anti-reflection film on the cell surface. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据