4.7 Article

Immobilization of acetylcholinesterase via biocompatible interface of silk fibroin for detection of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 258, 期 16, 页码 6040-6045

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.123

关键词

Biosensor; Acetylcholinesterase; Silk fibroin; Multiwall carbon nanotube

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8102009]
  2. Beijing Municipal Education Commission [KZ201110005006]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20247002, 21005005]
  4. Beijing Municipal Institution of Higher Learning Academic Innovating Group [PHR 201007105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An amperometric biosensor for the detection of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides was developed based on the immobilization of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) on regenerated silk fibroin (SF) matrix by non-covalent adsorption. SF and AChE were coated sequentially on the surface of the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) which was modified with multiwall carbon nanotube (MWNTs). The obtained biosensor was denoted as AChE-SF/MWNTs/GCE. The atomic force microscopy images showed that the SF matrix provided a more homogeneous interface for the AChE immobilization. The aggregation of immobilizing AChE was therefore avoided. The cyclic voltammogram of thiocholine at this biosensor exhibited a well defined oxidation peak at 0.667 V (vs. SCE). The inhibition rate of methyl parathion to the immobilized AChE was proportional to the logarithm of the concentration of methyl parathion over the range of the concentration of methyl parathion from 3.5 x 10(-6) to 2.0 x 10(-3)M with a detection limit of 5.0 x 10(-7) M. Similarly, the linearly response range of carbaryl was from 1.0 x 10(-7) to 3.0 x 10(-5)M with a detection limit of 6.0 x 10(-8) M. The experimental results indicate that AChE not only can be immobilized steadily on the SF matrix, but also the bioactivity of immobilizing AChE can be preserved effectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据