4.7 Article

Reciprocal changes of CD44 and GAP-43 expression in the dentate gyrus inner molecular layer after status epilepticus in mice

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 188, 期 1, 页码 1-10

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.03.019

关键词

epilepsy; neuropeptide Y; neurodegeneration; hippocampus; mossy fiber sprouting; pilocarpine; kainate; dentate gyrus; growth-associated protein; seizure

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS17771] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mossy fiber sprouting (MFS), a common feature of human temporal lobe epilepsy and many epilepsy animal models, contributes to hippocampal hyperexcitability. The molecular events responsible for MFS are not well understood, although the growth-associated protein GAP-43 has been implicated in rats. Here, we focus on the hyaluronan receptor CD44, which is involved in routing of retinal axons during development and is upregulated after injury in many tissues including brain. After pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (SE) in mice most hilar neurons died and neuropeptide Y (NPY) immunoreactivity appeared in the dentate inner molecular layer (IML) after 10-31 days indicative of MFS. Strong CD44 immumoreactivity appeared in the IML 3 days after pilocarpine, then declined over the next 4 weeks. Conversely, GAP-43 immunoreactivity was decreased in the IML at 3-10 days after pilocarpine-induced SE. After SE induced by repeated kainate injections, mice did not show any hilar cell loss or changes in CD44 or GAP-43 expression in the IML, and MFS was absent at 20-35 days. Thus, after SE in mice, early loss of GAP-43 and strong CD44 induction in the IML correlated with hilar cell loss and subsequent MFS. CD44 is one of the earliest proteins upregulated in the IML and coincides with early sprouting of mossy fibers, although its function is still unknown. We hypothesize that CD44 is involved in the response to axon terminal degeneration and/or neuronal reorganization preceding MFS. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据