4.5 Article

The mTOR/p70S6K signal transduction pathway plays a role in cardiac hypertrophy and influences expression of myosin heavy chain genes in vivo

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 257-267

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:CARD.0000041245.61136.56

关键词

pressure overload; cardiac hypertrophy; immunosuppressant; myosin heavy chain; rapamycin; signal transduction; translational regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Rapamycin (R) inhibits p70 S6 kinase (p70(S6K)) activity and hypertrophy of cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether rapamycin inhibits left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in intact rats and whether it alters cardiac gene expression. Methods: 300 g rats were subjected to aortic constriction (AC) or sham-operation (SH) and studied 2 and 3 days after surgery. Beginning 1 day prior to surgery, rats were injected with rapamycin (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or carboxymethylcellulose vehicle (V), yielding 4 groups (SH-V, SH-R, AC-V, AC-R). Total RNA was extracted for determination of mRNA levels by Northern blotting. Results: LV dry weight/body weight ratios were 0.43 +/- 0.04 (mean +/- SE) for SH-V, 0.46 +/- 0.02 for SH-R, 0.56 +/- 0.02 for AC-V, and 0.53 +/- 0.03 for AC-R. R inhibited cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure overload ( ANOVA; p < 0.05). Rapamycin had no effect on the expression of atrial natriuretic factor mRNA, but increased the levels of beta-myosin heavy chain mRNA 6-fold in hearts of SH-R and AC-R compared to SH-V. Rapamycin also increased the expression of alpha-myosin heavy chain mRNA in SH-R by 3-fold compared with SH-V, but had no effect on the AC-R group. Conclusion: The data suggest that an intact mTOR signaling pathway is required for rapid hypertrophic growth of the heart in vivo. Moreover, the data suggest a novel link between the mTOR/p70(S6K) signal transduction pathway and pretranslational control of myosin gene expression in the heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据