4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Anxiolytic effects of diazepam and ethanol in two behavioral models: comparison of males and females

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 445-458

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.04.017

关键词

anxiety; benzodiazepine; ethanol; sex differences; elevated plus maze; defensive prod burying; rats; corticosterone

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [K02 DA00249, R01 DA005932-08, K02 DA000249-05, R01 DA05932] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH63344, R01 MH063344-03, R01 MH063344, R01 MH063344-02, R01 MH063344-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study compared the anxiolytic effects of the benzodiazepine agonist diazepam and ethanol in adult male and female rats. Varying doses of diazepam (1-3 mg/kg) or ethanol (0.5-2.0 g/kg) were tested using both the elevated plus maze and defensive prod-burying models. Two time points following ethanol administration (10 and 30 min) were tested in the plus maze. Sex differences were seen in some anxiety-related behaviors, with females showing greater open arm time and reduced burying behavior than males. Although this suggests females displayed less anxiety-like behavior than males, the differences in the plus maze were not observed in all testing situations. Both diazepam and ethanol dose-dependently increased open arm times in the plus maze and reduced burying behavior in the defensive prodburying task. The parallel nature of the dose-response curves suggests that both diazepam and ethanol have similar anxiolytic effects in males and females. No sex differences were seen in the brain levels of diazepam-like activity or blood alcohol levels with these treatments. A greater corticosterone response was observed in females than males with these two behavioral tests, but neither diazepam nor ethanol decreased this response. These results suggest a dissociation between the anxiety-reducing influences of these compounds and the changes in stress-related endocrine responses. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据