4.7 Article

Na-doped hydroxyapatite coating on carbon/carbon composites: Preparation, in vitro bioactivity and biocompatibility

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 163-173

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.022

关键词

Hydroxyapatite; Coating; Electrochemical deposition; Carbon/carbon composites; Simulated body fluid

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072107]
  2. 111 Project of China [B08040]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2011M501473]
  4. Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing (NWPU), China [11-BZ-2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Na-doped hydroxyapatite (Na-HA) coating was directly prepared onto carbon/carbon (C/C) composites using electrochemical deposition (ECD) and themeanthickness of the coating is approximately 10 +/- 2 mu m. The formed Na-HA crystals which are Ca-deficient, are rod-like with a hexagonal cross section. The Na/P molar ratios of the coating formed on C/C substrate is 0.097. During the deposition, the Na-HA crystals grow in both radial and longitudinal directions, and faster along the longitudinal direction. The pattern formation of crystal growth leads to dense coating which would help to increase the bonding strength of the coating. The average shear bonding strength of Na-HA coating on C/C is 5.55 +/- 0.77 MPa. The in vitro bioactivity of the Na-HA coated C/C composites were investigated by soaking the samples in a simulated body fluid (SBF) for 14 days. The results indicate that the Na-HA coated C/C composites can rapidly induce bone-like apatite nucleation and growth on its surface in SBF. The in vitro cellular biocompatibility tests reveal that the Na-HA coating was better to improve the in vitro biocompatibility of C/C composites compared with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. It was suggested that the Na-HA coating might be an effective method to improve the surface bioactivity and biocompatibility of C/C composites. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据