4.4 Article

Reproductive and developmental toxicity in F1 Sprague-Dawley male rats exposed to di-n-butyl phthalate in utero and during lactation and determination of its NOAEL

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 669-676

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.04.009

关键词

di-n-butyl phthalate; maternal exposure; in utero; lactation; developmental toxicity; rat; NOAEL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) is one of the commonly used plasticizers in China. DBP can enter the environment and organisms through various routes and then affect reproductive and developmental processes of the organism and its descendants (mainly affecting male offspring). It is known that animals are sensitive to exposure of DBP in utero and during lactation. In the present study, pregnant rats were treated with different doses of DBP (0, 50, 250, and 500 mg/kg body weight/day) by daily gavage from GD1 to PND21. The developmental condition of F-1 rats and the reproductive system of mature F-1 male rats were monitored. DBP had no obvious effect on pregnant rats; however, it reduced several parameters including birth weight, number of live pups per litter, body weight gain and male anogenital distance. Severe damage to the reproductive system of mature F-1 male rats included testicular atrophy, underdeveloped or absent epididymis, undescended testes, obvious decline of epididymal sperm parameters, total sperm heads per g testis, decrease of organ/body weight ratio of epididymis and prostate, and was observed in the group treated with 250 mg/kg BW/day and higher. These results showed that the male reproductive system was the main target organ of DBP exposure. The NOAEL (no observable adverse effect level) for developmental toxicity of DBP was established based on pup body weight and male reproductive lesions at 50 mg/kg BW/day. Accordingly, the RfD for human exposure to DBP through oral intake was recommended as 500 mg/kg BW/day. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据