4.7 Article

Preparation of superhydrophobic films on titanium as effective corrosion barriers

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 257, 期 7, 页码 2587-2591

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.027

关键词

Superhydrophobic film; Titania; Corrosion inhibition; EIS; Structure

资金

  1. Shanghai Education Commission [10ZZ98]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50702053, 51003056]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [Y2008B46]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable superhydrophobic films were prepared on the electrochemical oxidized titania/titanium substrate by a simple immersion technique into a methanol solution of hydrolyzed 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyltriethoxysilane [CF3(CF2)(5)(CH2)(2)Si(OCH2CH3)(3), PTES] for 1 h at room temperature followed by a short annealing at 140 degrees C in air for 1 h. The surface morphologies and chemical composition of the film were characterized by means of water contact angle (CA), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), atomic force microscope (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The water contact angle on the surface of this film was measured to be as high as 160 degrees. SEM images showed that the resulting surfaces exhibited special hierarchical structure. The special hierarchical structure along with the low surface energy leads to the high surface superhydrophobicity. The corrosion resistance ability and durance property of the superhydrophobic film in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution was evaluated by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The anticorrosion properties of the superhydrophobic film are compared to those of unmodified pure titanium and titania/titanium substrates. The results showed that the superhydrophobic film provides an effective corrosion resistant coating for the titanium metal even with immersion periods up to 90 d in the 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution, pointing to promising future applications. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据