4.6 Article

Comparison of iron-molybdenum cofactor-deficient nitrogenase MoFe proteins by X-ray absorption spectroscopy - Implications for P-cluster biosynthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 27, 页码 28276-28282

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M403156200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 01209] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 67626] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogenase, the enzyme system responsible for biological nitrogen fixation, is believed to utilize two unique metalloclusters in catalysis. There is considerable interest in understanding how these metalloclusters are assembled in vivo. It has been presumed that immature iron-molybdenum cofactor-deficient nitrogenase MoFe proteins contain the P-cluster, although no biosynthetic pathway for the assembly of this complex cluster has been identified as yet. Through the comparison by iron K-edge x-ray absorption edge and extended fine structure analyses of cofactor-deficient MoFe proteins resulting from nifH and nifB deletion strains of Azotobacter vinelandii, a novel [Fe-S] cluster is identified in the DeltanifH MoFe protein. The iron-iron scattering displayed by the DeltanifH MoFe protein is more similar to that of a standard [Fe4S4]-containing protein than that of the DeltanifB MoFe protein, which is shown to contain a normal P-cluster. The iron-sulfur scattering of the DeltanifH MoFe protein, however, indicates differences in its cluster from an [Fe4S4](Cys)(4) site that may be consistent with the presence of either oxygenic or nitrogenic ligation. Based on these results, models for the [Fe-S] center in the DeltanifH MoFe protein are constructed, the most likely of which consist of two separate [ Fe4S4] sites, each with some non-cysteinyl coordination. This type of model suggests that the P-cluster is formed by the condensation of two [ Fe4S4] fragments, possibly concomitant with Fe protein (NifH)-induced conformational change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据