4.5 Article

Real-time RT-PCR analysis of housekeeping genes in human skeletal muscle following acute exercise

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 226-231

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00067.2004

关键词

gene expression; endogenous controls; validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies examining gene expression with RT-PCR typically normalize their mRNA data to a constitutively expressed housekeeping gene. The validity of a particular housekeeping gene must be determined for each experimental intervention. We examined the expression of various housekeeping genes following an acute bout of endurance ( END) or resistance ( RES) exercise. Twenty-four healthy subjects performed either a interval-type cycle ergometry workout to exhaustion (similar to75 min; END) or 300 single-leg eccentric contractions ( RES). Muscle biopsies were taken before exercise and 3 h and 48 h following exercise. Real-time RT-PCR was performed on beta-actin, cyclophilin (CYC), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and beta2-microglobulin (beta2M). In a second study, 10 healthy subjects performed 90 min of cycle ergometry at similar to65% of Vo(2) (max), and we examined a fifth housekeeping gene, 28S rRNA, and reexamined beta2M, from muscle biopsy samples taken immediately postexercise. We showed that CYC increased 48 h following both END and RES exercise (3- and 5-fold, respectively; P < 0.01), and 28S rRNA increased immediately following END exercise (2-fold; P = 0.02). beta-Actin trended toward an increase following END exercise (1.85-fold collapsed across time; P = 0.13), and GAPDH trended toward a small yet robust increase at 3 h following RES exercise (1.4-fold; P = 0.067). In contrast, beta 2M was not altered at any time point postexercise. We conclude that beta 2M and beta-actin are the most stably expressed housekeeping genes in skeletal muscle following RES exercise, whereas beta 2M and GAPDH are the most stably expressed following END exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据