4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Adsorption of heavy rare earth(III) with extraction resin containing bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) monothiophosphinic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 374, 期 1-2, 页码 434-437

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.11.056

关键词

adsorption; extraction resin; Cyanex302; thulium; separation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present paper, the adsorption of thulium(Ill) from chloride medium on an extraction resin containing bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) monothiophosphinic acid (CL302, HL) has been studied. The results show that 1.5 h is enough for the adsorption equilibrium. The distribution coefficients are determined as a function of the acidity of the aqueous phase and the data are analyzed both graphically and numerically. The plots of log D versus pH give a straight line with a slope of about 3, indicating that 3 protons are released in the adsorption reaction of thulium(III). The content of Cyanex302 in the resin is determined to be 48.21%. The total amount of Tm3+ adsorbed up to resin saturation is determined to be 82.46 mg Tm3+/g resin. Therefore, the sorption reactions of Tm3+ from chloride medium with CL302 can be described as: Tm3+ + 3HL((r)) <----> TmL3(r) + 3H(+) The Freundlich's isothermal adsorption equation is also determined as: log Q = 0.73 log C + 3.05 The amounts (Q) of Tm3+ adsorbed with the resin have been studied at different temperatures (15-40degreesC) at fixed concentrations of Tm3+, amounts of extraction resin, ion strength and acidities in the aqueous phase. The thermodynamic quantities, i.e., DeltaG, DeltaH and DeltaS can thus be determined. In addition, the adsorption of gadolinium(III), terbium(III), dysprosium(III), holmium(III), erbium(III) using the extraction resin has also been investigated and compared with the result of thulium(III). The efficiency of the resin in the separation of the metal ions is provided according to the separation factors. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据