4.7 Article

A GIS-based gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern of Shanghai metropolitan area, China

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 1-16

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.006

关键词

urbanization; gradient analysis; landscape metrics; landscape pattern; metropolitan Shanghai

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantifying landscape pattern and its change is essential for the monitoring and assessment of ecological consequences of urbanization. As the largest city in the country, metropolitan Shanghai is now the fastest growing area among all major Chinese cities with more than 13 million residents. Using the GIS-based land use data set of the year 1994 and combining gradient analysis with landscape metrics, we attempted to quantify the spatial pattern of urbanization in the Shanghai metropolitan area. The results of transect analysis with class-level metrics showed that the spatial pattern of urbanization could be quantified reliably using landscape metrics and different land use types exhibited distinctive, but not necessarily unique, spatial signatures. The results of transect analysis with landscape-level metrics showed that urbanization in the metropolitan Shanghai region has resulted in dramatic increases in patch density (PD), edge density (ED), and patch and landscape shape complexity, and sharp decreases in the largest and mean patch size (NIPS), agriculture land use type, and landscape connectivity. The general pattern of urbanization was that the increasingly urbanized landscape became compositionally more diverse, geometrically more complex, and ecologically more fragmented. In addition, our results supported the hypotheses that, with increasing urbanization, patch density increases while patch size and landscape connectivity decrease. However, our results on patch shape seemed to reject the hypothesis that patch shape becomes more regular as human modification to landscapes intensifies. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据