4.6 Article

Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae iron-sulfur cluster assembly genes and oxidative stress relevant to Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 29, 页码 29938-29943

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M402795200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 46828] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 50016] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) show several metabolic defects including aerobic blockages in methionine and lysine biosynthesis. We have previously shown that mutations in genes implicated in the formation of iron-sulfur clusters, designated seo ( suppressors of endogenous oxidation), reverse the oxygen-dependent methionine and lysine auxotrophies of a sod1Delta strain. We now report the surprising finding that seo mutants do not reduce oxidative damage as shown by the lack of reduction of EPR-detectable free iron, which is characteristic of sod1Delta mutants. In fact, they exhibit increased oxidative damage as evidenced by increased accumulation of protein carbonyls. The seo class of mutants overaccumulates mitochondrial iron, and this iron accumulation is critical for suppression of the sod1Delta biosynthetic defects. Blocking overaccumulation of mitochondrial iron abolished the ability of the seo mutants to suppress the sod1Delta auxotrophies. By contrast, increasing the mitochondrial iron content of sod1Delta yeast using high copy MMT1, which encodes a mitochondrial iron transporter, was sufficient to mimic the seo mutants. Our studies indicated that suppression of the sod1Delta methionine auxotrophy was dependent on the pentose phosphate pathway, which is a major source of NADPH production. By comparison, the sod1Delta lysine auxotrophy appears to be reversed in the seo mutants by increased expression of genes in the lysine biosynthetic pathway, perhaps through sensing of mitochondrial damage by the retrograde response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据