4.7 Article

The decrease of plaque volume during percutaneous coronary intervention has a negative impact on coronary flow in acute myocardial infarction - A major role of percutaneous coronary intervention-induced embolization

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.036

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate how decreased plaque volume during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) affects coronary flow in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND Coronary flow after reperfusion therapy is a major determinant of clinical outcomes in patients with AMI. However, little is still known about the changes in coronary flow that appear after PCI in response to the decreased plaque during the procedure. METHODS The study group comprised 60 patients with AMI who underwent pre- and post-PCI intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Qualitative band quantitative analyses were performed on all IVUS procedures. External elastic membrane volume (EEMV), lumen volume (LV), and plaque volume (PV) were measured every 1.0 mm to include the lesion and reference segments 3.0 mm proximal and distal to the lesion. The difference between pre- and post-PCI PV was defined as the index of the decrease in plaque volume (DeltaPV). The corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) was used to evaluate coronary flow after PCI. RESULTS Plaque volume was decreased at post-PCI IVUS in all 60 patients. Inadequate reflow (CTFC > 40) was observed in 13 patients (21.7%). The decrease in PV was significantly larger in patients with inadequate reflow than in those with reflow (49.4 +/- 18.9 vs. 31.7 +/- 15.5 mm(3), p = 0.0010). Also, DeltaPV was significantly correlated with CTFC after PCI (r = 0.415, p = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS The decrease in PV during PCI has a negative impact on coronary flow after PCI in patients with AMI. Embolization induced by PCI may occur in all patients with AMI. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据