4.6 Article

Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems

期刊

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 1023-1049

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.391

关键词

near-fault ground motion; barrier model; rise time; response; elastic and inelastic; reduction factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to investigate the response of structures to near-fault seismic excitations, the ground motion input should be properly characterized and parameterized in terms of simple, yet accurate and reliable, mathematical models whose input parameters have a clear physical interpretation and scale, to the extent possible, with earthquake magnitude. Such a mathematical model for the representation of the coherent (long-period) ground motion components has been proposed by the authors in a previous study and is being exploited in this article for the investigation of the elastic and inelastic response of the single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system to near-fault seismic excitations. A parametric analysis of the dynamic response of the SDOF system as a function of the input parameters of the mathematical model is performed to gain insight regarding the near-fault ground motion characteristics that significantly affect the elastic and inelastic structural performance. A parameter of the mathematical representation of near-fault motions, referred to as 'pulse duration' (T-p), emerges as a key parameter of the problem under investigation. Specifically, T-p is employed to normalize the elastic and inelastic response spectra of actual near-fault strong ground motion records. Such normalization makes feasible the specification of design spectra and reduction factors appropriate for near-fault ground motions. The 'pulse duration' (T-p) is related to an important parameter of the rupture process referred to as 'rise time' (tau) which is controlled by the dimension of the sub-events that compose the mainshock. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据