4.7 Article

Hydrochemistry and hydrology of forest riparian wetlands

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 196, 期 2-3, 页码 187-197

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.055

关键词

clear-cuttin; groundwater; nitrate; denitrification; sulphate reduction; riparian wetland

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forest stream riparian wetlands have a number of important features. This investigation treats one aspect, the nitrogen retention after upland clear-cutting which leads to elevated nitrate leaching, and the importance of the flow pathways in this connection. The runoff occurs mainly via the upper permeable section of the peat while the lower peat act as an aquitard, restricting the flow from the underlying till. The till groundwater is progressively artesian towards the discharging stream. Water analyses from piezometers show that the water chemistry in the peat is rather variable, indicating the presence of channelling. Channelling is also indicated by spring discharges from the peat that have elevated nitrate contents pointing to bypass flow. Redox bars indicating sulphate reduction display the same picture of irregular distribution. However, a general observation is that volumes with sulphate reduction increase towards the stream and that sulphate reduction occurs preferably in the surface peat, indicating the importance of a degradable substrate for the sulphate reducers. Nitrate reduction during the growth season occurs predominantly close to the upland till areas. The riparian tree stand is dominated by spruces which are likely to be disfavoured by the rising groundwater level after clear-cutting. The riparian tree stand does not extend far enough towards the upland to be benefited by the elevated nitrate flux. Buffer stands should be broader, extending into the till upland where they can utilise the leached nitrate and, more important, thanks to their deeper rooting depth protect the peatland trees against wind felling. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据