4.8 Article

A role for heme in Alzheimer's disease:: Heme binds amyloid β and has altered metabolism

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404349101

关键词

mitochondria; heme-a; iron; clioquinol; ferrochelatase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heme is a common factor linking several metabolic perturbations in Alzheimer's disease (AD), including iron metabolism, mitochondrial complex IV, heme oxygenase, and bilirubin. Therefore, we determined whether heme metabolism was altered in temporal lobes obtained at autopsy from AD patients and age-matched nondemented subjects. AD brain demonstrated 2.5-fold more heme-b (P < 0.01) and 26% less heme-a (P = 0.16) compared with controls, resulting in a highly significant 2.9-fold decrease in heme-a/heme-b ratio (P < 0.001). Moreover, the strong Pearson correlation between heme-a and heme-b measured in control individuals (r(2) = 0.66, P < 0.002, n = 11) was abolished in AD subjects (r(2) = 0.076, P = 0.39, n = 12). The level of ferrochelatase (which makes heme-b in the mitochondrial matrix) in AD subjects was 4.2 times (P < 0.04) that in nondemented controls, suggesting up-regulated heme synthesis. To look for a possible connection between these observations and established mechanisms in AD pathology, we examined possible interactions between amyloid is (Abeta) and heme. Abeta((1-40)) and Abeta((1-42)) induced a redshift of 15-20 nm in the spectrum of heme-b and heme-a suggesting that heme binds Abeta, likely to one or more of the histidine residues. Lastly, in a tissue culture model, we found that clioquinol, a metal chelator in clinical trials for AD therapy, decreased intracellular heme. In light of these observations, we have proposed a model of AD pathobiology in which intracellular Abeta complexes with free heme, thereby decreasing its bioavailability (e.g., heme-a) and resulting in functional heme deficiency. The model integrates disparate observations, including Abeta, mitochondrial dysfunction, cholesterol, and the proposed efficacy of clioquinol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据