4.6 Article

Biomechanical considerations of fracture treatment and bone quality maintenance in elderly patients and patients with osteoporosis

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000132263.14046.0c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem that is characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility and an increased susceptibility to fractures of the hip, spine, and wrist. Poor bone quality in patients with osteoporosis presents the surgeon with difficult treatment decisions. Bone fracture repair has more pathways with combinations of bone formation mechanisms, which depend on the type of fracture fixation to be applied to achieve the desirable immobilization. There only may be one remodeling principle and in less than ideal conditions, mechanical and biophysical stimuli may provide effective augmentation of fracture healing in elderly patients. A different stimulus may limit its association to a specific healing mechanism. However, no matter which fixation method is used, an accurate reduction is a requisite for bone healing. Failure to realign the fracture site would result in delayed union, malunion, or nonunion. Therefore, a basic understanding of the biomechanics of osteoporotic bone and its treatment is necessary for clinicians to establish appropriate clinical treatment principles to minimize complications and enhance the patient's quality of life. We describe the biomechanical considerations of osteoporosis and fracture treatment from various aspects. First, bone structure and strength characterization are discussed using a hierarchical approach, followed by an innovative knowledge-based approach for fracture reduction planning and execution, which particularly is beneficial to osteoporotic fracture. Finally, a brief review of the results of several experimental animal models under different fracture types, gap morphologic features, rigidity of fixation devices, subsequent loading

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据