4.6 Article

Electrical stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in patients with primary generalized dystonia: long-term results

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 189-194

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.2.0189

关键词

dystonia; deep brain stimulation; globus pallidus; DYT1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object. Primary generalized dystonia (PGD) is a medically refractory disease of the brain causing twisting or spasmodic movements and abnormal postures. In more than 30% of cases it is associated with the autosomal DYT1 mutation. Continuous electrical stimulation of the globus pallidus intemus (GPi) has been used successfully in the treatment of PGD. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of PGD in children and adults with and without the DYT1 mutation. Methods. Thirty-one patients with PGD were selected for surgery. Electrodes were bilaterally implanted under stereotactic guidance and connected to neurostimulators that were inserted subcutaneously. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing scores on the clinical and functional Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) before and after implantation. The efficacy of stimulation improved with time. After 2 years, compared with preoperative values, the mean standard deviation) clinical and functional BFMDRS scores had improved by 79 +/- 19% and 65 +/- 33%, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up examination the improvement was comparable in patients with and without the DYT1 mutation in both the functional (p = 0.12) and clinical (p = 0.33) scores. Children displayed greater improvements in the clinical score than adult patients (p = 0.04) at 2 years of follow up. In contrast, there was no significant difference in functional scores between children and adults (p = 0.95). Conclusions. Electrical stimulation of the GPi is an effective, reversible, and adaptable treatment for PGD and should be considered for conditions refractory to pharmaceutical therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据