4.6 Article

Phospholipase C gene expression, protein content, and activities in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure due to volume overload

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01107.2003

关键词

cardiac sarcolemma; signal transduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Volume overload due to arteriovenous (AV) shunt results in cardiac hypertrophy followed by the progression to heart failure. The phosphoinositide phospholipase C (PLC) converts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to 1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG) and mositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate (OP3), which are known to influence cardiac function. Therefore, we examined the time course of changes in DAG and IP3 as well as PLC isozyme gene expression, protein content, and activities in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure induced by AV shunt in Sprague-Dawley rats by the needle technique. An increase in the left ventricle (LV)-to-body weight ratio demonstrated that LV hypertrophy was established at 4 wk after the induction of the shunt. PLC-beta(1) activity was increased two- and sevenfold at 3 days and I and 2 wk after the induction of volume overload, respectively. These changes were associated with increases in the mRNA and sarcolemmal (SL) protein content; however. no changes in PLC-beta(1) were detected at 4 wk. On the other hand, a significant increase in PLC-gamma(1) activity as well as mRNA and SL protein was seen at 3 days and 4 wk. A progressive decrease in PLC-delta(1) activity with concomitant reductions in the gene expression and SL protein abundance was detected during 1 to 4 wk. Activity of gamma(1)- and delta(1)-isozymes was significantly depressed during the 8- and 16-wk time points, whereas PI-isozyme was increased significantly during these time points. A progressive decrease in the SL PIP, content was observed during cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Our findings indicate that PLC isozyme signaling processes are increased in hypertrophy and decreased in heart failure due to volume overload.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据