4.4 Article

Attack and reproductive success of mountain pine beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in fire-damaged lodgepole pines

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1070-1080

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.4.1070

关键词

Dendroctonus ponderosae; fire damage; habitat selection; population density

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-intensity fires are known to kill adult and larval bark beetles, but it is unclear bow mountain pine beetles (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) respond to trees that have been damaged by lower-intensity ground fires at the periphery of burns. We conducted an experiment to determine whether mountain pine beetles preferentially attack trees that have been damaged by fire and to determine how fire damage affects beetles' reproductive success. We simulated different intensities of ground fires by artificially burning a strip of bark that extended zero-thirds, one-third, two-thirds, or three-thirds around a tree's circumference. Burn treatments were applied similar to7 wk before beetles emerged from surrounding trees. We found that beetles did not preferentially attack fire-damaged trees; fire damage had no effect on the number of beetles landing on a tree, which trees were attacked, attack rate, attack density, or the body size of beetles attacking a tree. Beetle reproductive success (number and condition of offspring) was also not affected by fire damage. Beetles were more likely to overcome tree defenses and produce successful egg galleries on fire-damaged trees than on undamaged trees, but this was only observed on trees with low beetle attack densities. If beetle attack density was high, trees were successfully attacked irrespective of burn treatment. Our results suggest that fire damage only affects mountain pine beetle reproduction and population growth in areas where attack densities are low. In other situations, fire damage will have negligible effects oil beetle attack and reproductive success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据