4.8 Article

Herb medicine Inchin-ko-to (TJ-135) regulates PDGF-BB-dependent signaling pathways of hepatic stellate cells in primary culture and attenuates development of liver fibrosis induced by thioacetamide administration in rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 242-250

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.04.005

关键词

traditional Chinese medicine; collagen; mitogen-activated protein kinase; migration; cell proliferation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: We studied the effect of Inchin-ko-to (TJ-135), a herb medicine that has been clinically used for liver cirrhosis in Japan, on liver fibrosis in a rat model and on the function of stellate cells. Methods: Rat liver fibrosis was generated by thioacetamide (TAA) administration. DNA synthesis was assessed by 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation assay. Protein expression was analysed by western blotting. Collagen and fibronectin mRNA expression were analysed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: TJ-135 improved liver fibrosis induced in rats by TAA administration. TJ-135 reduced collagen deposition and the expression of smooth muscle alpha-actin in fibrotic liver tissues and decreased the serum level of hyaluronic acid. In primary-cultured stellate cells, TJ-135 suppressed DNA synthesis and the expression of collagen oil(I), collagen III, and fibronectin mRNAs. It hampered DNA synthesis and migration of PDGF-BB-stimulated stellate cells through inhibiting phosphorylation of PDGF receptor-beta and down-stream signaling pathways. Among TJ-135 components, 3-methyl-1,6,8-trihydroxyanthraquinone (emodin) derived from Rhei rhizoma was found to be the most active molecule. Conclusions: TJ-135 and emodin regulate PDGF-dependent events in stellate cells and attenuate the development of liver fibrosis. Their clinical use may be beneficial for the therapy of human liver fibrosis. (C) 2004 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据