4.7 Article

A silicon-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays electrode with enhanced photoelectrocatalytic activity

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 255, 期 5, 页码 2167-2172

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.053

关键词

Titanium dioxide; Nanotube; Silicon; Doped; Photoelectrochemical capability

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation PR China [20507003, 20337020]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [20525723]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon-doped titania nanotube arrays were fabricated by electrochemical anodization on a Ti sheet, followed by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) treatment using tetraethylorthosilicate as silicon source. The highly ordered nanotube arrays obtained by anodization kept its nanotube-like structural integrity after CVD treatment. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) results revealed that the introduced silicon might be incorporated into titania matrix. This incorporation helped to increase the thermal stability of titania, which was in favor of suppressing the phase transformation from anatase into rutile and also inhibiting the growth of anatase crystallite of titania at high calcination temperature. A significant blue-shift was observed in the spectrum of UV absorption. The surface of Si-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays showed a super-hydrophilic behavior under UV illumination. For Si-doped TiO2 nanotube electrode, the maximum photoconversion efficiencies of 31.8% under high-pressure mercury lamp irradiation and 16.5% using an optical. filter (280-400 nm) under the same lamp irradiation were achieved, which were obviously higher than those of undoped one. The photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) activities were investigated using pentachlorophenol (PCP) as a probe substance. Compared with undoped TiO2 nanotube electrode, the Si-doped TiO2 showed better PEC capability in the degradation of PCP under high-pressure mercury lamp irradiation. (C) 2008 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据