4.4 Article

Validation of the Dermatology Life Quality Index as an outcome measure for urticaria-related quality of life

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 93, 期 2, 页码 142-146

出版社

AMER COLL ALLERGY ASTHMA IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61466-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is a debilitating skin disease that affects patients' quality of life (QOL). The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) assesses QOL parameters across several types of dermatologic conditions. However, an evaluation of the validity of the DLQI for use in CIU patients has not been undertaken, because CIU, unlike other chronic skin conditions, is subject to daily or weekly symptom fluctuations. Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the DLQI in 2 samples of CIU patients treated with fexofenadine hydrochloride (20, 60, 120, or 240 mg twice daily). Methods: Data were obtained from 2 similar multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of CIU patients (n = 418 and n = 439). Patients completed the 10-item DLQI during 3 clinic visits (approximately 2 weeks apart). Clinic personnel also recorded patients' symptoms. Results: The results of the DLQI items were similar to those obtained with other skin disease populations, indicating the presence of relatively symmetrical distributions. Reliability was high, demonstrating the lack of excessive random measurement error (a coefficient = .89 and .87 for samples 1 and 2). Factor analysis resulted in a unidimensional pattern, supporting the use of a total DLQI score. Most DLQI items distinguished patients with varying degrees of QOL impairment, highlighting the sensitivity of this instrument. Construct validity was moderate, providing evidence that the DLQI was responsive to changes in patients' clinical status. Conclusions: The DLQI is a valid, reliable, and clinically useful outcome measure for assessing QOL in CIU patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据