4.7 Review

Lysosomal cysteine proteases in atherosclerosis

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000134530.27208.41

关键词

atherosclerosis; cysteine proteases; cathepsins; cystatin; cytokines

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 60942, HL67283, HL 67249, HL-56985] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease characterized by extensive remodeling of the extracellular matrix architecture of the arterial wall. Although matrix metalloproteinases and serine proteases participate in these pathologic events, recent data from atherosclerotic patients and animals suggest the participation of lysosomal cysteine proteases in atherogenesis. Atherosclerotic lesions in humans overexpress the elastolytic and collagenolytic cathepsins S, K, and L but show relatively reduced expression of cystatin C, their endogenous inhibitor, suggesting a shift in the balance between cysteine proteases and their inhibitor that favors remodeling of the vascular wall. Extracts of human atheromatous tissue show greater elastolytic activity in vitro than do those from healthy donors. The cysteinyl protease inhibitor E64d limits this increased elastolysis, indicating involvement of cysteine proteases in elastin degradation during atherogenesis. Furthermore, inflammatory cytokines augment expression and secretion of active cysteine proteases from cultured monocyte-derived macrophages, vascular smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells and increase degradation of extracellular elastin and collagen. Cathepsin S-deficient cells or those treated with E64d show significantly impaired elastolytic or collagenolytic activity. Additionally, recent in vivo studies of atherosclerosis-prone, LDL receptor-null mice lacking cathepsin S show participation of this enzyme in the initial infiltration of leukocytes, medial elastic lamina degradation, endothelial cell invasion, and neovascularization, illustrating an important role for cysteine proteases in arterial remodeling and atherogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据