4.3 Article

Randomized controlled trial of sour milk on blood pressure in borderline hypertensive men

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 701-706

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.674

关键词

blood pressure; hypertension; fermented milk; tripeptides; randomized controlled trial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was carried out to assess the effect of sour milk, containing two tripeptides (valine-proline-proline and isoleucine-proline-proline), on blood pressure (BP). Methods: A total of 46 borderline hypertensive men aged 23 to 59 years were recruited at their workplace for this trial. Subjects were randomly allocated into two groups; sour milk drink group (S-group, n = 23) and placebo (acidified milk) drink group (P-group, n = 23) for 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured twice at each occasion by a physician, at the health center of the company, with a mercury sphygmomanometer at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 10.0J. Results: The S-group and P-group showed no significant difference in baseline systolic BP (mean [SD], S: 147.6 [9.6], P: 145.3 [13.0]) or diastolic BP (S: 95.3 [9.91, P: 91.5 [9.6]). In the S-group, change in systolic BP at 2 and 4 weeks were -4.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.3 to -0.4; P =.032) and -5.2 turn Hg (95% Cl -10.1 to -0.3; P =.039), both statistically significant. Diastolic BP showed change from -1.7 mm Hg (95% Cl -5.4 to 2.0) at 2 weeks and -2.0 (95% CI -5.4 to 1.5) at 4 weeks, respectively. In the P-group, change in systolic BP was -0.5 (95% Cl -5.8 to 4.8) at 2 weeks and -3.7 (95% Cl -8.3 to 0.9) at 4 weeks and change in diastolic BP was -0.6 (95% Cl -4.7 to 3.6) at 2 weeks and -0.3 (95% Cl -3.9 to 3.3) at 4 weeks, which were not statistically significant. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated the beneficial effect of sour milk on BP in borderline hypertensive men who were not taking antihypertensive medication. (C) 2004 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据