4.8 Article

Biological evaluation and drug delivery application of cationically modified phospholipid polymers

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 25, 期 19, 页码 4785-4796

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.034

关键词

phosphorylcholine coatings; cationic charge; protein adsorption; haemocompatibility coronary stent; drug delivery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phospholipid-like polymers based on 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine containing varying amounts of the cationically charged monomer choline methacrylate (CMA) from 0 to 30wt% have been prepared. Substrates coated with these materials were shown to bind significantly lower amounts of specific proteins compared to the uncoated control. ELISA assays demonstrated that fibrinogen did not bind appreciably to coatings containing 0-30%, CMA, whereas albumin binding was seen to increase significantly as the CMA content of the coating increased. Platelet activation assays. measurement of plasma coagulation time and whole blood contact scanning electron micrography demonstrated that the haemocompatibility of the coatings was shown to be unaffected by the CMA component. The CMA polymer coatings have been shown to absorb/adsorb many different drug compounds covering a wide range of molecular weights and release these in a controlled fashion. The range of cationic polymers assessed can interact with the net negative charge found in many large therapeutic biomolecules. such as DNA fragments used in gene therapy. that may be of interest in the preventative treatment of conditions such as restenosis. Coronary stents coated with 6% or 20% CMA-containing polymers have been shown to load and release this type of genetic material irrespective of molecular weight of the biomolecular. Ex vivo and in vivo studies have shown that these compounds can be delivered to the stented section of the vessel with very low quantities delivered outside the vessel target area. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据