4.7 Article

Dietary composition as a determinant of plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine in subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia

期刊

METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
卷 53, 期 8, 页码 1072-1075

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2003.12.028

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is an endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor that participates in the regulation of vasodilatory function and is also linked to hypertension, whereas its stereoisomere, symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), is biologically inactive. Dietary components influence vascular functions and a high-fat meal seems to increase postprandial plasma ADMA levels. However, it has not been published whether diet influences plasma ADMA levels. In this study, we investigated the impact of diet on plasma ADMA and SDMA levels. Thirty-four mildly hypercholesterolemic, otherwise healthy women (n = 14) and men (n = 20) with a mean age of 46.2 years (range, 35 to 62 years) participated in the study. The subjects were examined twice at intervals of 2 months. Seven-day food records were used to analyze diet and alcohol intake. ADMA was measured by using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry. In a multivariate analysis (R-2 = 0.20, P <.002), low amount of energy received from carbohydrates (r = -0.31, P =.009) and high plasma triglycerides (r = 0.30, P =.01) were predictors of high ADMA plasma levels. Alcohol drinkers had higher plasma ADMA concentrations than abstainers (0.50 +/- 0.13 v 0.42 +/- 0.11 mumol/L, P =.04). Plasma ADMA correlated with systolic (r = 0.60, P =.005) and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.53, P =.02) in abstainers but not in alcohol drinkers. Plasma SDMA was not associated with any dietary components or with blood pressure. In conclusion, a high amount of dietary carbohydrates is strongly associated with low levels of plasma ADMA. Concentration of ADMA in plasma seems to be higher in alcohol drinkers than in abstainers. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据