4.7 Article

Randomized controlled trial of nutritional supplementation in patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis and wasting

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 460-465

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL NUTRITION
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/80.2.460

关键词

tuberculosis; wasting; nutritional supplements; body composition; physical function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Nutritional support is often recommended as part of the treatment of tuberculosis, but it has never been properly tested. Objective: We assessed the effects of early nutritional intervention on lean mass and physical function in patients with tuberculosis and wasting. Design: Patients who started antituberculous therapy within the previous 2 wk were randomly assigned to receive standard nutritional counseling (control group) or nutritional counseling to increase their intake through diet and high-energy supplements (nutritional supplement group) for 6 wk. Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and physical function was assessed by maximum grip strength. Results: Patients in the nutritional supplement group (n = 19) had a significantly greater increase in body weight (2.57 +/- 1.78 compared with 0.84 +/- 0.89 kg, P = 0.001), total lean mass (1.17 +/- 0.93 compared with 0.04 +/- 1.26 kg, P = 0.006), and grip strength (2.79 +/- 3.11 compared with -0.65 +/- 4.48 kg, P = 0.016) than did the control subjects (n = 17) at week 6. During subsequent follow-up, the increase in body weight remained greater in the nutritional supplement group, but this increase was due mainly to a greater gain in fat mass in the nutritional supplement group than in the control group. Conclusions: Early intervention to increase nutritional intake increases lean mass and physical function. This adjunct to tuberculosis therapy could confer socioeconomic and survival benefits that deserve investigation in large-scale trials. Nutritional intervention after the initial phase of treatment could be less beneficial because it mainly increases fat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据