4.5 Article

Influence of age and physical activity on the primary in vivo antibody and T cell-mediated responses in men

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 491-498

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01404.2003

关键词

immune function; vaccination; human

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [2 M01-RR-00051] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI48577] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aging immune system is characterized by the progressive decline in the antibody and T cell-mediated responses to antigen. Little is known, however, about the benefits of exercise in aging on the generation of a primary immune response to antigen and the subsequent antibody and memory T cell-mediated response. Most in vivo immune research to date has utilized vaccines or recall antigens to elicit an immune response. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to examine the association of aging and physical activity on the primary antibody and T cell response to the novel protein antigen keyhole-limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Forty-six physically active and sedentary, young (20-35 yr) and older (60-79 yr) men were recruited. Subjects were intramuscularly immunized with 100 mug of KLH, and blood samples were collected at days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Samples were measured for anti-KLH IgM, IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 by ELISA. On day 21 after intramuscular KLH administration, subjects received an intradermal injection with I jig of KLH of inflammation recorded at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h to assess anti-KLH delayed-type hypersensitivity response. There was a significant reduction in all anti-KLH measures with aging except for anti-KLH IgG2. The physically active older group had significantly higher anti-KLH IgM, IgG, IgG1, and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses, but not IgG2 compared with the sedentary older group. In conclusion, regular physical activity in older men is associated with a more robust immune response to novel antigenic challenge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据