4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Preoperative oral carbohydrate attenuates endogenous glucose after surgery

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 733-741

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2003.12.007

关键词

surgery; carbohydrate; glucose metabolism; glucose clamp technique; insulin resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Postoperative metabolism is characterised by insulin resistance and a negative whole-body nitrogen balance. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment reduces insulin resistance in the first day after surgery. We hypothesised that preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment attenuates insulin resistance and improves whole-body nitrogen balance 3 days after surgery. Methods: Fourteen patients undergoing total hip replacement were double-blindly randomised to preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment (12.5%, 800+400ml, n=8) or placebo (n=6). Glucose kinetics (6,6-D-2-glucose), substrate utilisation (indirect calorimetry) and insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp) were measured preoperatively and on the third day after surgery. Nitrogen losses were monitored for 3 days after surgery. Values are mean (SEM). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistics were used. Results: Endogenous glucose release during insulin infusion increased after surgery in the placebo group. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment, as compared to placebo, significantly attenuated postoperative endogenous glucose release (0.69 (0.07) vs. 1.21 (0.13) mg kg(-1) (.) min(-1), P<0.01), while whole-body glucose disposal and nitrogen balance were similar between groups. Conclusions: While insulin resistance in the first day after surgery has previously been characterised by reduced glucose disposal, enhanced endogenous glucose release was the main component of postoperative insulin resistance on the third postoperative day. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment attenuated endogenous glucose release on the third postoperative day. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据