4.7 Article

Basilar artery vasospasm and delayed posterior circulation ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

期刊

STROKE
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 1867-1872

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000133397.44528.f8

关键词

basilar artery; vasospasm; cerebral blood flow; tomography, emission computed; ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial; subarachnoid hemorrhage; brain stem; ischemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-The clinical and hemodynamic impacts of basilar artery ( BA) vasospasm ( VS) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are ill-defined. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between BA-VS and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) with posterior circulation after aneurysmal SAH. Methods-Daily transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurements of posterior and anterior circulation arteries were conducted in 162 patients with aneurysmal SAH. rCBF to the brain stem (BS) and other brain territories was assessed by multiple single-photon emission computed tomography with Tc-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer single-photon emission computed tomography (ECD-SPECT) imaging during the course of VS. Results-SPECT imaging showed delayed BS hypoperfusion in 29 patients (17.9%). Of them, 23 patients (79.3%) were found to have BA-VS. Patients with very high BA flow velocities (FVs; > 115 cm/s) had a 50% chance of developing delayed BS ischemia. BA-VS was found at a higher rate in patients who experienced reduced rCBF in the cerebellum (56.3%), thalamic nuclei (68.4%), and occipital lobe (81.8%). Although patients with delayed BS hypoperfusion did not present with a higher clinical grade, their clinical outcome was significantly worse ( Glasgow Outcome Score after 30 days 2.48 +/- 1.16 versus 3.3 +/- 1.27; P = 0.001). Conclusions-These findings suggest for the first time that BA-VS after aneurysmal SAH is associated with hypoperfusion to BS and other posterior circulation territories. The risk for delayed BS ischemia increased significantly when TCD BA-FVs were > 115 cm/s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据