4.4 Article

Proapoptotic effect of proteolytic activation of matrix metalloproteinases by Streptococcus pyogenes thiol proteinase (Streptococcus pyrogenic exotoxin B)

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 4836-4847

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4836-4847.2004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptococcus pyogenes thiol proteinase, also known as streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B (Spell), has been suggested to be a major virulence factor in S. pyogenes infection. Spell was reported to induce apoptosis of host cells, but its mechanism of action is not yet fully understood. In this study, we examined the involvement of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in SpeB-induced apoptosis. We first developed a large-scale preparation of recombinant SpeB and precursors of human MMP-9 and -2 (proMMPs) by using Escherichia coli Rosetta (DE3)pLysS and baculovirus-insect cell expression systems, respectively. Treatment with SpeB induced effective proteolytic activation of both proMMP-9 and -2. When RAW264 murine macrophages were incubated with SpeB-activated proMMP-9, the level of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in conditioned medium (CM), assessed by an enzyme immunoassay, was elevated. This increase was completely inhibited by addition of the MNIP inhibitor SI-27 to the cell culture. The CM also produced marked induction of apoptosis of U937 human monocytic cells. Similarly, soluble Fas ligand (sFasL) was detected in CM of cultures of SW480 cells expressing FasL after treatment with SpeB-activated proMMPs; this CM also induced apoptosis in U937 cells. Spell had a direct effect as well and caused the release of TNF-alpha and sFasL from the cells. SpeB-dependent production of MMP-9 and -2 and proapoptotic molecules (TNF-alpha and sFasL) was evident in a murine model of severe invasive S. pyogenes infection. These results suggest that Spell or SpeB-activated MMPs contribute to tissue damage and streptococcal invasion in the host via extracellular release of TNF-alpha and sFasL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据