4.6 Article

Association of a 5178C→A (Leu237Met) polymorphism in the mitochondrial DNA with a low prevalence of myocardial infarction in Japanese individuals

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 175, 期 2, 页码 281-286

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.03.008

关键词

mitochondrial DNA; single nucleotide polymorphism; myocardial infarction; association study; longevity; Japanese individuals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because mitochondria are the major sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, certain alterations in mitochondrial functions can lead to metabolic perturbation in vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, resulting in vascular dysfunction. We previously demonstrated that a C --> A transversion in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) at nucleotide 5178 of the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene, which results in a Leu --> Met substitution at amino acid 237, was found more frequently in Japanese centenarians than in controls. We also demonstrated that this Mt5178C --> A polymorphism has anti-atherosclerotic effects in diabetic subjects. We have now examined whether the Mt5178C --> A (Leu237Met) polymorphism in the mitochondrial ND2 gene is associated with a low prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) in a case-control study. The genotype of ND2 gene was determined either with a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) or a colorimetry-based allele-specific DNA probe assay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and hyperuricemia revealed - that the frequency of the Mt5178A genotype was significantly higher in controls than in subjects with MI. These results suggest that the 5178A C Genotype of mitochondrial ND2 gene polymorphism is protective against MI; and this effect would explain, at least in part, its contribution to longevity. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据