3.8 Article

The rote of dextran conjugation in transifection mediated by dextran-grafted polyethylenimine

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 895-905

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.572

关键词

gene therapy; conjugation; non-viral vector; cellular mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Conjugation through primary amines is one of the most commonly used methods to modify polycationic vectors for gene delivery. A better understanding of the effect of the conjugation on the mechanisms of transgene expression can help design efficient polycationic vectors. Methods Dextran with a molecular weight of 1500 was grafted onto polyethylenimine (PEI) to produce various degrees of grafting in an effort to investigate how the conjugation affected the mechanisms of transgene expression. Flow cytometry was employed to quantitate the cellular entry of plasmid and the level of transgene expression, which were measured using ethidium monoazide labeled plasmid and green fluorescent protein (GFP), respectively. The buffering capacity of the grafted PEI was determined by titration, and the integrity of the DNA-polymer complexes were examined by exposure to heparin. Results Grafting of dextran onto PEI was found to significantly diminish the cytotoxicity, buffering capacity, cellular entry, and the integrity of the DNA-polymer complexes. The reductions enlarged as the degree of grafting increased from 0 to 1.84%; however, at an optimal degree of grafting, the dextran-grafted PEI enhanced the percentages of GFP-positive cells to a level 3 times and 1.3 times of those mediated by unmodified PEI for CHO and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. Conclusions These results demonstrated that the conjugation of dextran onto the primary amines of PEI inhibited the entry of plasmid across the cell membrane, but the change in the structures of the DNA-polymer complexes was able to promote transgene expression when the degrees of conjugation fell below 0.64%. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据