4.7 Article

Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 82, 期 2, 页码 292-294

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.082

关键词

preimplantation genetic diagnosis; aneuploidy testing; IVF efficiency; chromosomal translocation; preimplantation HLA testing; live-born pregnancy outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To review a 12-year experience of the world's three largest preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) centers. Design: Multicenter analysis of the clinical outcome of PGD. Setting: In vitro fertilization programs at the Reproductive Genetics Institute, Chicago, Illinois; Saint Barnabas Medical Center, West Orange, New Jersey; and SISMER, Bologna, Italy. Patient(s): Poor-prognosis IVF patients, patients carrying balanced chromosomal translocations, and couples at risk for producing children with Mendelian disorders. Intervention(s): In vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, polar body removal, blastomere biopsy, and ET. Main Outcome Measure(s): DNA or chromosomal analysis of biopsied polar bodies or blastomeres, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, and live-born pregnancy outcome. Result(s): A total of 754 babies have been born as a result of 4,748 PGD attempts, which shows the expanded application and the practical relevance of PGD for single-gene disorders, chromosomal aneuploidies and translocations, late-onset diseases with genetic predisposition, and nondisease testing in couples at need for human leukocyte antigens-matched offspring for treatment of affected siblings. Conclusion(s): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is evolving to become a clinical option for couples at risk for producing offspring with Mendelian diseases, has a positive numerical impact in standard assisted reproduction practices through aneuploidy testing, and reduces by at least fourfold the spontaneous abortion rate in couples carrying translocations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据