4.3 Article

Genetic signatures of pre-expansion bottleneck in the choctaw population of Oklahoma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 124, 期 4, 页码 373-379

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10363

关键词

population bottleneck; excess of homozygosity; imbalance index

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [3M01-RR-02558-1251] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [2P50-AR-44888] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES11174] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM41399] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous research showed that the Choctaw Indians of Oklahoma exhibit considerable linkage disequilibria (LD) in a number of regions of the genome that has allowed genetic fine mapping for potential susceptibility genes for the autoimmune connective tissue disease scleroderma, or systemic sclerosis (SSc). In principle, such enhanced background LD in the Choctaws could be caused by population bottleneck event(s) followed by recent population expansion. This investigation utilizes genome-scan data on 175 dinucleotide loci from 76 Choctaw individuals to seek genetic evidence of the demographic history of the Choctaw Nation. Of the 175 loci examined, 105 are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The average unbiased homozygosity over the 105 loci for the Choctaws (29.3%) is significantly higher than that in the European descent group (20.9%); and when adjusted for sample-size differences, the Choctaw also exhibit a significantly smaller number of segregating alleles (6.65 vs. 8.14) at these loci. Both of these observations are consistent with the trend expected in an isolated population. Comparison of the allele size variance and gene diversity yields an imbalance index (lnbeta) of 0.811 in the Choctaw. Of the 105 loci examined, 93 exhibit excess expected homozygosity in comparison to the expectations of a stepwise mutation model in a population of constant size. Taken together, these observations are consistent with a signature of the recent population size expansion of the Choctaws, preceded by bottleneck event(s). (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据