4.4 Article

Inhibition of human cytochromes P450 by components of Ginkgo biloba

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1039-1044

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1211/0022357044021

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [AT-01381, AT-00607] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00054] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [AG-17880] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-13834, DA-13209, DA-05258] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK/AI-58496] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-58435] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extraction, isolation and characterization of 29 natural products contained in Ginkgo biloba have been described, which we have now tested for their in-vitro capacity to inhibit the five major human cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms in human liver microsomes. Weak or negligible inhibitory activity was found for the terpene trilactones (ginkgolides A, B, C and J, and bilobalide), and the flavonol glycosides. However 50% inhibitory activity (IC50) was found at concentrations less than 10 mug mL(-1) for the flavonol aglycones (kaempferol, quercetin, apigenin, myricetin, tamarixetin) with CYP1A2 and CYP3A. Quercetin, the biflavone amentoflavone, sesamin, as well as (Z,Z)-4,4'-(1,4-pentadiene-1,5-diyl)diphenol and 3-nonadec-8-enyl-benzene-1,2-diol, were also inhibitors of CYP2C9. The IC50 of amentoflavone for CYP2C9 was 0.019 mug mL(-1) (0.035 muM). Thus, the principal components of Ginkgo biloba preparations in clinical use (terpene trilactones and flavonol glycosides) do not significantly inhibit these human CYPs in-vitro. However, flavonol aglycones, the biflavonol amentoflavone and several other non-glycosidic constituents are significant in-vitro inhibitors of CYP. The clinical importance of these potential inhibitors will depend on their amounts in ginkgo preparations sold to the public, and the extent to which their bioavailability allows them to reach the CYP enzymes in-situ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据