4.4 Article

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of astrocytomas - Prognostic and diagnostic implications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 166-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60507-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R37 CA011898, CA11898, R501-CA-68119-04, P20 CA096890] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 30] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [P50 NS020023, NS20023] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytoma is comprised of a group of common intracranial neoplasms that are classified into four grades based on the World Health Organization histological criteria and patient survival. To date, histological grade, patient age, and clinical performance, as reflected in the Karnofsky score, are the most reliable prognostic predictors. Recently, there has been a significant effort to identify additional prognostic markers using objective molecular genetic techniques. We believe that the identification of such markers will characterize new chromosomal loci important in astrocytoma. progression and aid clinical diagnosis and prognosis. To this end, our laboratory used comparative genomic hybridization to identify DNA sequence copy number changes in 102 astrocytomas. Novel losses of 19p loci were detected in low-grade pilocytic astrocytomas and losses of loci on 9p, 10, and 22 along with gains on 7, 19, and 20 were detected in a significant proportion of high-grade astrocytomas. The Cox proportional hazards statistical modeling showed that the presence of +7q and -10q comparative genomic hybridization alterations significantly increased a patient's risk of dying, independent of histological grade. This investigation demonstrates the efficacy of comparative genomic hybridization for identifying tumor suppressor and oncogene loci in different astrocytic grades. The cumulative effect of these loci is an important consideration in their diagnostic and prognostic implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据