4.6 Article

Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags

期刊

MOLECULAR BREEDING
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 21-34

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000037992.03731.a5

关键词

fruit color; Lycopersicon esculentum; mapping; QTL; single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are useful for characterizing allelic variation, for genome-wide mapping, and as a tool for marker-assisted selection. Discovery of SNPs through de novo sequencing is inefficient within cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) because the polymorphism rate is more than ten-fold lower than the sequencing error rate. The availability of expressed sequence tag (EST) data has made it feasible to discover putative SNPs in silico prior to experimental verification. By exploiting redundancy among EST data available for different varieties among 148,373 tomato ESTs, we have identified candidate SNPs for use within cultivated germplasm pools. 1,245 contigs having three EST sequences of Rio Grande and three EST sequences of TA496 were used for SNP discovery. We detected 1 SNP for every 8,500 bases analyzed, with 101 candidate SNPs in 44 genes identified. Sixty-six SNPs could be recognized by restriction enzymes, and subsequent experimental verification using restriction digestion or CEL I digestion confirmed 83% of the putative polymorphisms tested. SNPs between TA496 and Rio Grande have a high probability (53%) of detecting polymorphisms between other L. esculentum varieties. Twenty-six SNPs in 18 unigenes were mapped to specific chromosomes. Two SNPs, LEOH23 and LEOH37, were shown to be linked to quantitative trait loci contributing to fruit color within elite breeding populations. These results suggest that the growing databases of DNA sequence will yield information that facilitates improvement within the germplasm pools that have contributed to productive modern varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据