4.7 Article

Age and gender affect ventricular-vascular coupling during aerobic exercise

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.041

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to examine the age-associated differences in ventricular-vascular coupling, defined by the ratio of arterial elastance (EaI) to left ventricular systolic elastance (ELVI), and its components, at rest and during exercise. BACKGROUND Ejection fraction (EF) increases during exercise, but the EF reserve decreases with aging. Ejection fraction is inversely related to EaI/ELVI, an index of the interaction between arterial and ventricular properties, which is an important determinant of cardiac performance. Thus, age differences in EaI/ELVI during exercise, due to age differences in EaI, ELVI, or both, may help to explain the age deficit in EF reserve. METHODS We noninvasively characterized EaI/ELVI = end-systolic volume index (ESVI)/stroke volume index (SVI) and its two determinants EaI = end-systolic pressure/SVI, and ELVI = end-systolic pressure/ESVI, at rest and during exercise in 239 healthy men and women (age range, 21 to 87 years). Blood pressures were assessed with cuff sphygomanometry, and cardiac volumes with gated blood pool scintingraphy. RESULTS Resting EaI/ELVI was not age related in men or women. In both sexes, EaI/ELVI decreased during exercise and declined to a lesser extent in older subjects. There were gender differences in the components of EaI/ELVI during exercise: EaI was greater in older versus young women (p = 0.01) but was unaffected by age in men. Left ventricular systolic elastance increased to a greater extent in young versus older subjects (p = 0.0001 for men, p = 0.07 for women). CONCLUSIONS Age-associated differences in EaI/ELVI occur in both genders during exercise. Sub-optimal ventricular-vascular coupling helps to explain the age-associated blunting of maximal exercise EF, and its underlying mechanisms appear to differ between men and women. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据