4.5 Article

Analysis of the cellular expression pattern of β-CGRP in α-CGRP-deficient mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 476, 期 1, 页码 32-43

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20211

关键词

calcitonin gene-related peptide; somatosensory; motor neuron; gene expression; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we compared the alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide (alphaCGRP) and betaCGRP expression patterns in wild-type and knockout mice by using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. In dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord of wild-type animals, aCGRP mRNA was about two times more abundant than betaCGRP mRNA. The betaCGRP mRNA was the only isoform expressed in the intestine. In alphaCGRP knockout mice, we found no change in betaCGRP mRNA levels in dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord compared with wild-type controls, but a twofold decrease in the intestine. CGRP immunoreactivity (IR) was detected in many small and some large neurons in the dorsal root ganglia, was found in sensory fibers and motor neurons in the spinal cord, and labeled neuromuscular junctions in wild-type mice. In the dorsal root ganglia of aCGRP knockout mice, punctate betaCGRP-IR again was predominantly found in small neurons. In the spinal cord, betaCGRP-IR fibers were localized to the outermost layer of the dorsal horn. IR was found in the cell bodies of motor neurons, but it was undetectable in neuromuscular junctions. In the intestine, CGRP-IR was localized to neurons of the myenteric plexus and to fibers in the mucosal folds, with similar staining intensity in both wild-type and knockout mice. Finally, CGRP-IR was undetectable in preganglionic fibers and postganglionic sympathetic neurons in mice from both genotypes. Our results indicate that alphaCGRP and betaCGRP are variably coexpressed in different functional aspects of the mouse nervous system. This pattern suggests distinct roles for betaCGRP in pain, neuromuscular, and gastrointestinal systems. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据