4.0 Article

Hyperthyroidism and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter - A population-based study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 164, 期 15, 页码 1675-1678

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1675

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac manifestation of hyperthyroidism. The relation between hyperthyroidism and atrial fibrillation has so far been analyzed in a limited number of selected patients, and the strength of the association has not been estimated. We examined the risk of atrial fibrillation among patients aged 20 to 89 years with hyperthyroidism diagnosed in hospitals in Denmark during a 20-year period. Methods: We identified all patients with an incident hospital diagnosis of hyperthyroidism during the study period in the Danish National Registry of Patients, and among those we identified patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or flutter that occurred 30 days from the date of the hospital diagnosis of hyperthyroidism. We used logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between sex, 10-year age group, cardiovascular diseases, and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Results: Among 40 628 patients diagnosed as having hyperthyroidism, 3362 (8.3%) were diagnosed as having atrial fibrillation or flutter within +/-30 days from the date of the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism. The following factors were associated with risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter: male sex (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-1.9), age (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.7-1.8) per 10-year increment, ischemic heart disease (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.0), congestive heart failure (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 3.5-4.4), and heart valve disease (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9-3.4). Conclusion: Male sex, increasing age, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and heart valve disease are associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter in patients with hyperthyroidism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据