4.7 Article

The nature of a gravitationally lensed submillimetre arc in MS0451.6-0305:: two interacting galaxies at z∼2.9?

期刊

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07982.x

关键词

gravitational lensing; methods : numerical; techniques : image processing; galaxies : clusters : individual : MS 0451.6-0305; submillimetre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new SCUBA image of the cluster MS 0451.6-0305, which exhibits strong, extended submillimetre flux at 850 mum. The most striking feature in the map is an elongated region of bright submillimetre emission, with a flux density of similar to10 mJy over several beam sizes. This region is apparently coincident with a previously known optical arc [which turns out to be a strongly lensed Lyman break galaxy (LBG) at z = 2.911], as well as with a newly identified multiply imaged ERO (extremely red object) pair predicted to be at a similar, if not identical redshift. By combining a detailed lensing model with deep images from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), Chandra, Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) and spectra from the Very Large Telescope (VLT), we conclude that both the strongly lensed optical arc and ERO systems have properties consistent with known submillimetre emitters. Using a simple model for the two sources, we estimate that the multiply lensed EROs contribute the majority of the flux in the SCUBA lensed arc. Correcting for the lensing amplification, we estimate that the inherent 850-mum fluxes for both objects are less than or similar to0.4 mJy. If the LBG and ERO pair are truly at the same redshift, then they are separated by only similar to10 kpc in the source plane, and hence constitute an interacting system at z similar to 2.9. Higher angular resolution observations in submillimetre/millimetre will permit us to separate the contribution more accurately from each candidate, and better understand the nature of this system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据