4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel oral cell-cycle inhibitor Ro 31-7453 in patients with advanced solid tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 16, 页码 3366-3374

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.007

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To determine maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of Ro 31-7453, a novel, oral cell-cycle inhibitor. Patients and Methods Using an accelerated dose-escalation schedule, 48 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with doses of Ro 31-7453 ranging from 25 to 800 mg/m(2)/d given for 4 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. The total daily dose was taken as a single dose (schedule A) or divided into two equal doses taken 12 hours apart (schedule 3). PK samples of blood and urine were collected on the first and last days of dosing in cycles 1 and 2. Results Forty-five patients completed at least one cycle of therapy. Myelosuppression and stomatitis were dose-limiting toxicities, occurring at the 800 mg/m(2)/d dose level for both schedules. Toxicity was independent of body-surface area, leading to the recommended phase II flat dose of 1,000 mg daily for 4 days for both schedules. Common adverse events included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, alopecia, and elevated liver-function tests. One death, related to neutropenic sepsis, occurred on study. The PK of the parent compound and major metabolites were apparently linear, with a half-life of approximately 9 hours and a maximum concentration of approximately 4 hours. Minor antitumor activity was observed against carcinoma of the lung, breast, pancreas, and ovary. Conclusion Ro 31-7453 was well tolerated, with manageable adverse effects. Significant PK variability (absorption, metabolism, and excretion) was observed, and a substantial number of additional patients are needed to confirm the recommended phase II dose. Additional pharmacology and phase II studies are under way to explore the dose-toxicity relationship.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据