4.7 Article

Efficient local packing in metallic glasses

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 342, 期 1-3, 页码 89-96

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.05.017

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple topological model in an earlier manuscript has provided additional support for the concept that efficient atomic packing is a fundamental principle in the formation of metallic glasses. In that work, an approach for defining and quantifying the local packing efficiency, P, was developed for solute-centered clusters that contained only solvent atoms in the first coordination shell. In the present work, this methodology is extended to allow quantification of P when more than one atomic species is present in the first coordination shell. This analysis is applied to several metallic glasses using published experimental data of partial coordination numbers. It is shown that packing in the first coordination shell is generally very efficient, even though the systems studied have significant differences in atomic species, compositions and relative atomic sizes. It is shown that packing is generally efficient around both solute and solvent atom species. Local packing efficiencies much less than unity are expected to be uncommon, since the global average packing efficiency is near unity and local packing efficiencies greater than unity are physically improbable. Deviations from efficiently packed configurations are discussed with respect to the local packing efficiencies in competing crystalline structures and with poorer glass forming ability. The values of P obtained for metallic glasses are essentially identical to the values obtained from a similar analysis of the competing crystalline structures. These results are consistent with frequent earlier reports of topological short range ordering in metallic glasses and with developments that have established the relationship between dense atomic packing and glass formation. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据