4.7 Article

Study of glycated amino acid elimination reaction for an improved enzymatic glycated albumin measurement method

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 346, 期 2, 页码 135-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.019

关键词

glycated albumin; glycated amino acid elimination reaction; bromocresolpurple

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In order to improve enzymatic glycated albumin measurement, we studied the endogenous glycated amino acid elimination reaction and the new bromocresolpurple (BCP) method for albumin measurement. Methods: In the assay, endogenous glycated amino acids are first eliminated by oxidation by ketoamine oxidase. Second, glycated albumin is hydrolyzed to glycated amino acids by proteinase digestion, and glycated amino acids are oxidized to produce hydrogen peroxide, which is quantitatively measured. Third, albumin is measured by the new BCP method. Finally, glycated albumin value is calculated as the percentage of glycated albumin in total albumin. Results: Glycated amino acid concentrations in prepared total parenteral nutrition products were increased in direct proportion to storage time and temperature. The glycated amino acid elimination reaction using ketoamine oxidase may be able to eliminate more than 15 mmol/l glycated amino acids. The glycated albumin values of samples calculated from the albumin concentrations using the new BCP method accorded with those calculated with the HPLC method. Fundamental performances (linearity, dilution test, analytical recovery, within-run and between-run CVs, interference study) of the present method were good. Detection of glycated albumin by the present method was significantly correlated with detection of glycated albumin by the high-performance liquid chromatography method (r(p) = 0.995). Conclusions: This new improved method is free of interference by endogenous glycated amino acids and is unaffected by albumin concentration, and enables more accurate analysis of glycated albumin. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据